|
STUDY OF ANOMALIES: WYOMING/MONTANA/IDAHO ON MAY 13, 2004
Despite the suspicions that some people have about NEXRAD and
radar anomalies, it's interesting that not a single conspiracy theorist picked up on a truly
interesting radar anomaly in Montana in May 2004. My NAADP anomaly-monitoring
program detected this immediately and I wrote up the rest of this page within days of the anomaly,
but I refrained from making this page public until August to see if any conspiracy theorist had an
explanation for the anomaly--or had even noticed it. As far as I can tell, it went
completely undetected by those that supposedly are watching these anomalies carefully.
On May 13, 2004 at approximately 19:00Z (1:00pm MDT, noon PDT) a number of NEXRAD radar anomalies were observed at the Riverton WY,
Billings MT, Missoula MT, Spokane WA, and Pendleton OR sites. The event also appears to have
been detected to a lesser extent by the Boise ID and Glasgow MT sites.
The event seems to have consisted of an object which created electromagnetic interference
traveling northwest from northwestern Wyoming to north central Idaho. It appears this was an
object as opposed to a meteorological event due to the "spoking" observed which is consistent
with aerial traffic (such as was observed with the Reno anomalies).
Aircraft are not generally detected by NEXRAD, but NEXRAD "spoking" anomalies
do occur if an aircraft "illuminates" the NEXRAD site with its own radar or with another
electromagnetic source that is operating at approximately the same frequency as the nexrad site
(3GHz).
Since the event was detected by multiple radar sites at the same time, a relatively accurate
position for the object at each point in time can be obtained by triangulating from two or
more sites. This is accomplished in the images below by overlaying image from one radar on
top of the image of another radar that detected the event at approximately the same time (within
a minute or two). In each case, the image shown is the overlayed/triangulated version while
the links are provided to the source images for each radar site, the date/time of that site's
image, and the angle at which the event was recorded by that site.
#1: 18:45Z
Billings 18:46Z: 172-176 (174)
Riverton 18:44Z: 1-2 (1)
Object At: 44.23076N, 108.44863W
|
#2: 18:56Z
Billings 18:56Z: 274
Missoula 18:55Z: 110-111 (110)
Object At: 45.90601N, 109.80705W
|
#3: 19:06Z
Billings 19:06Z: 283-284 (283)
Missoula 19:05Z: 112-114 (113)
Object At: 46.27504N, 111.46954W
|
#4: 19:26Z
Missoula 19:24Z: Saturation not overlayed
Spokane 19:28Z: 105-110 degrees
Object At: 47.0411N, 113.986W
|
#5: 19:35Z
Missoula 19:32Z: 274-277 (275)
Spokane 19:33Z: 105-112 (108)
Pendleton 19:35Z: 50-51 (50)
Object At: 47.22696N, 116.09931W
Mis/Pend: 47.15305N, 116.23861W
Pend/Spo: 47.30088N, 115.96002W
Mis/Spo: 47.10422N, 115.14391W
|
#6: 19:38Z
Missoula 19:38Z: 280-282 (281)
Spokane 19:39Z: 106-119 (112)
Object At: 47.33130N, 116.37736W
|
A couple of notes regarding the above triangulation...
First, at point #4 at 19:26 we assume the object is over Missoula because the spoking from Spokane
is consistent with Missoula while the imagery from Missoula shows
complete saturation (as seen
to the right). While we
cannot be completely sure, it seems reasonable to believe that the object was overhead at Missoula
such that the electromagnetic radiation was detected in all directions. Prior and subsequent
images show spoking in directions consistent with the object in those directions so it seems logical
to conclude that the object was over Missoula and when the Missoula imagery showed the
complete saturation.
Second, at point #5 we have a total of three sites that presented the anomaly so we have
three possible locations for the object depending on which set of sites we use to triangulate.
The Missoula/Spokane triangulation calculated a point about 40 miles east of the triangulation
calculated by Pendleton/Spokane and Pendleton/Missoula. This is not surprising due to the fact
that the relative angles between Missoula and Spokane are very small--the object is almost
directly between them so using the bearings from each of them to determine the location of
the object is not going to be very accurate. Therefore, we discard the Missoula/Spokane
triangulation and average the Pendleton/Spokane and Pendleton/Missoula triangulation (which
were accurate within 16 miles) to determine our point location for #5.
Analysis of object location, speed, and direction
According to the object locations calculated by the triangulations above, we are able to
conclude the following:
| From Point |
To Point |
Distance |
Time |
Speed |
Bearing |
| 1: 44.23076N, 108.44863W @ 18:45 |
2: 45.90601N, 109.80705W @ 18:56 |
133 mi |
11 mins |
725 mph (Mach 1.01) |
300 |
| 2: 45.90601N, 109.80705W @ 18:56 |
3: 46.27504N, 111.46954W @ 19:06 |
83.6 mi |
10 mins |
502 mph |
282 |
| 3: 46.27504N, 111.46954W @ 19:06 |
4: 47.0411N, 113.986W @ 19:26 |
130 mi |
20 mins |
390 mph |
286 |
| 4: 47.0411N, 113.986W @ 19:26 |
5: 47.22696N, 116.09931W @ 19:35 |
100 mi |
9 mins |
666 mph |
275 |
| 5: 47.22696N, 116.09931W @ 19:35 |
6: 47.33130N, 116.37736W @ 19:38 |
14.8 mi |
3 mins |
296 mph |
290 |
The object was generally traveling west northwest with an trip bearing of 291 degrees. The first
leg of its trip was 300 degrees after which the average bearing was 282. It appears that the
object may have broken the speed of sound on the first leg of its trip, slowed down as it
passed over Missoula, and then may have sped up. However, the speed of 666 mph on the second
to last leg may not be accurate since it involves point #5 for which we triangulated 3 different
positions. Nevertheless, the 666 mph figure seems to be quite reasonable since if we use the
Spokane/Missoula triangulation we actually end up with a speed of around 1000 mph for the last
leg.
Analyis
It seems quite certain that
an object radiating electromagnetic energy traveled from approximately point 1 to point 6
covering a total of 461 miles in 53 minutes for an average speed of 522 mph although the
initial speed of the object was significantly higher than the average. It appears quite
probable that the object was traveling initially at a relatively high speed (725 mph) and
slowed down as it approached and passed over Missoula. It then appears to have accelerated
as it left the Missoula area.
It most probably was a military aircraft. It is interesting, though, that it was illuminating
radars all the way and that there don't appear to be any significant military installations
along the travel path. It is not uncommon for military aircraft to cause this kind of interference
with nearby NEXRAD radars due to the electromagnetic energy transmitted by the plane (probably
its onboard radar), but it is most often seen in specific areas such as central Nevada
at Fallon airbase. It is also normally sporadic, appearing on some (but not all) imagery from
nearby radars. This is due to the fact that it will only appear on the nearby radar(s) if the
plane's radar happens to be aimed at the NEXRAD site at the moment the NEXRAD is doing a scan
in that direction. This is normally not common except at sites like Fallon where you may have
dozens of aircraft flying in many directions at the same time which increases the chances
that at least one of them will illuminate the radar site. Any single aircraft normally has a
relatively low probability of illuminating a NEXRAD site in a way that will create this kind
of spoking interference--the aircraft's radar would have to be actively transmitting in the direction
of the NEXRAD site at the same time the NEXRAD is "listening" in the direction of the aircraft.
This event was unique in that the object covered a large distance at a relatively high speed
outside of restricted military airspace and the object was detected quite consistently by
all affected NEXRAD sites. This suggests the electromagnetic energy emitted by the object was
omnidirectional and probably constant which is not typical of radar. If the EM was not
constant it would be unlikely that so many NEXRADs would be able to pick up the object. Likewise,
if the EM was not omnidirectional it is unlikely that NEXRAD sites would pick up the object once
it passed since the EM would then be aimed away from the NEXRAD site.
Conclusion
It appears that an object traveled at a relatively high rate of speed from northwestern Wyoming
to north central Idaho. The object appears to have emitted constant omnidirectional
electromagnetic energy at a frequency that was detectable by NEXRAD sites along the path.
The fact that the EM energy appears to have been omnidirectional and constant is not consistent
with typical aircraft radar.
|