Letxa.com

I am the owner of Radarmatrix and I will gladly add my 2 cents. I do need to take some time and go thru Letxa2000's post because it is rather long winded but I definitely give Kudos to the poster! This is the most I've had someone try and discredit my views and to be honest, why someone would spend so much time trying to discredit something he didn't believe is a bit odd! I am no scientist and I base my views on Facts, Patents, Documents and my common sense. Much of my views are also based on 3 years of observation. DAILY!

Before I get into the details of Letxa2000's post, I need him to answer a few things just so I know his common sense is intact.

First would be that he does recognize that the government has been trying to change weather for sometime now! At this point I should not have to provide the documentation because it is on my site and I assume he has seen them. This question alone will make or break him because it is the Pandora's box of common sense!

Second would be that he recognizes the Patents for HAARP and how they are used to interact with the Ionosphere and to create Ionospheric mirrors.

Third would be that he explain why only Billings and North Platte shoot these things that I term "electrical fingers" No other radars do this! These 2 radars have been EXTREMELY active in the last few months. Both were very dormant in the summer.

Forth would be explaining why only 10% of the radar cause blast, which mostly happened around 2000 to the beginning of 2003. They have calmed down a whole lot now. Also that he accepts that I have shown proof that a blast has actually sparked highs, lows and also those "magnetic strips" that are seen on Satellite. "Magnetic strips" are what I term them.

Fifth would be that he understands the vacuum that is created as the sun comes and goes. Especially along the East side of the rocky mountain ridge. This vacuum is key.

One must have a running understanding of electricity and magnetics to understand how this electrical grid works. Most of our radars now are polarmeteric. Which means they do not scan in one direction anymore. They now scan by sending out a vertical signal and a horizontal signal. Basically reading in 3D. This is a lot of electricity being thrown out by radars. You have 140 in the US. Of which some are at military bases and a far more powerful. Chemtrails, in my view, are used to make the air over radars more conductive. Carnicom has done a lot of studies and found that Barium is a key ingredient. Barium is found in magnets and if you ever get a cat scan you'll be drinking Barium before hand. If you locate your main radar and study in that direction over a year, you will see that a vast amount of the trails are sprayed in that direction and they tend to stick there!

Weather control is very easy to understand when you keep in mind that we live inside an electrical grid. There are 4 main points of control: HAARP basically is for the jetstream, LOWS are used to steer a system, cold dense air is a conductor for the electricity and the rocky mountain wall is used to add electricity that creates a front that backs up energy or to let it build up.

HAARP is basically a Huge magnet. When HAARP starts pulsing at higher MHz, it heats straight up and basically plugs into all the electricity surrounding our planet. In fact HAARP's position is more important than anything else. It is located underneath the "Electrojet." This is where all the Sun's energy coagulates. This is full of energy! In regards to the jetstream, if it is going over alaska and HAARP comes on, it will effectively create a pivot point in which the jetstream will not be able to dip below it but will come down into the US just over the Rockies. At the beginning of this Fall we had a very bad cold spell in the US. It was WAY to early to get that kind of cold but this was the system that brought it in. HAARP was pulsing at the time. HAARP also can Attract the jetstream up from the gulf. Much like a magnet. Obviously this is my belief and not scientific. As for the connection from HAARP to the radars I have stepped back from that view for now. Accept when I see Billings Spark the "Electrical fingers" in HAARPS direction. I see a lot more correlation and connection between the 2 in summer time when the vacuum swells become so huge that, at the peak of the vacuum, the whole US will fire up storms. From top to bottom. I do believe HAARP has a help in drawing the vacuum harder.

If you ever see a gravity map of the US, you will see that gravity is the greatest over Alaska (where HAARP is) and down the Rocky Mountains. Gravity and magnetism are very closely related. The earth has a north and south pole and a magnetic structure around it. The way you make a magnet is by running a direct current thru something. Anything can be magnetised! Weather included. Especially with Barium and metals thrown in. Electrical lines have a magnetic field. The mountains being so high up and more gravity means that more electricity build up along this ridge. Many Many times you will see a front start on the mountains. Energy gets back up here.

It is my belief that Billings is charging this line when it sparks southward. Which in the last few months I would guestimate that this radar has sparked south on average 3 times a day. Easily! Again, only Billings and North Platte do these kinds of returns on a regular bases. This is fact! I save animations every day!

Now for the main control...LOWS. Take some time and watch the Colorado Ridge. When a low gets stuck on this ridge the vacuum will increase its size and power. This last system we had was all controlled from that one low. From that juncture it allows moisture to be pulled up from the gulf and collide with the cold fronts. Often times you will see the "question mark" effect of weather that spreads from Texas all the way north into a loop. 3 times last year we had hurricane size lows go across the US. They all started on the ridge. It was only last year that I noticed this ridge of radars flare up on purpose! From there I believe a low can be steered from radar to radar. Especially in this extremely cold dense air. Cold Dense Air is supper conductive. Many of you will notice the amount of shocks you get during this time. The electrical field is right on top of you. In the document "Owning the weather by 2025," fog was a big part of what they wanted to create. One reason is to be hidden but the main part is because fog is so highly conductive to electricity and EMP's (electrical magnetic pulses). In the fog you have radars, cell towers, GWEN towers and so on adding electricity around you. When Wellstone's plane went down it was in this type of environment.

Many of you who have visited my site know that I personally caught the "magnetic strip" that sparked as his plane went down. It showed up on Satellite and those 2 little prongs went on both sides of the airport. That is more than a coincidence! There is a Professor Fetzer from Minnesota that is claiming that Wellstone's plane was taken out by an EMP. I believe this to be true and I have sent Wellstone's lawyers and family my findings! This also brings into focus what the Deceased Astronauts discovered before they died. They were the first of ALL the astronauts to discover "Red Arcs of Light" circling the earth. Just little red strips firing away. NO OTHER ASTRONAUT has witnessed these! I believe they witnessed Star Wars in action. I believe that the "magnetic strip" I caught for Wellstone are the exact same things they discovered!

In the summer time watch a radar in Texas located at Dyess AFB. It sits smack dab in-between the most volatile air on earth. Tornado Alley. In this region a radar can actually ignite long lines of storms. Last year I caught this radar triggering storms for almost 48 hours. There was no activity on the radar accept from it's center northwards. it looked like a match with fire coming off it!

These are some random views so I will let you all chomp on them for a while. I have had many people try and discredit me and none have come close to convincing me otherwise. My belief is solid because I do stem my work from the point of common sense that our military wants to control the weather. George Washington himself won a battle by attacking in the dead of winter. Which was unheard of back then. So even in the earliest times of America, weather has been a factor of war. It is a great asset and it can be a great Burden. I did also call my local news channel and had one guy tell me point blank that the chemtrail activity was the military doing exercises. As you could imagine, my mouth dropped! I think 911 is allowing this to continue under the security perception! Obviously our representatives and American's would not be so keen on knowing the Government can control weather which is why we have ENRONS. They are a front to milk money to pay for this. The Patents for HAARP are sitting in the hands of OIL/ENERGY firms. Our government right now is being ran by the same people. Enron was Bush's number one contributor. His father was the spokesman for Star Wars. They own it and few people know the true reality of what it is.

Star Wars and this electrical grid has its place if and when a nuke comes at us. Being that true missile defense comes from creating an atmosphere were you can send out an EMP and discharge the electronics of the missile. This is all Tesla 101 and is also common sense. The whole "bullet to Bullet" defense is a joke and a smoke screen! Fortunately, nukes are not an everyday occurrence. So weather control best suits their money making ways. See ENRON and what they did to California for justification. That was on the heels of one of the hottest summers ever. That summer they did not have one blackout because Jim Jeffords switch parties and gave Dems subpoena power. Then Enron Fell! Chemtrails and the layers of crap that it creates will trap in UV rays. This may very well be what Global warming is from! I have actually witnessed a full campaign of spraying only to see the planes disappear and the sandy substance left behind get cooked away. On those night I could taste a chlorine/metallic taste in the air. When this happened I would stare at the stars as if I were looking thru a magnifying glass. I honestly wonder about this affect on us. Especially when the sun is out!

Chemtrails are real and anyone who sits and watch a clear blue sky get over cast from these high flying planes knows the truth. I have video taped it one to many times and correlated it with "NASA's contrail prediction program" (also located on my site) and it never lines up. The humidity is low and in many of my videos I tape regular planes that are on the SAME PLAIN and one will have a normal contrail and the other goes from skyline to skyline and fans out. I know what I see and when you type "Chemtrails" into google, 50,000 pages can't just be a conspiracy!

On the note of chemtrails, The 2002 winter Olympics was one of the first MAJOR weather experiments I documented. I suggest you check it out on my web page. Read about how the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Research Program (why the DOE is involved in weather is a mystery) but read how they performed test over Salt Lake by spraying "perfluorocarbon tracers" over the area. It was a major experiment! Perfluorocarbon tracers have been put inside the new 20 dollar bills and possibly others to trace large sums of money from satellite. You wanna talk about being marked well here is a starting place to study!

Watch the whole series of animations leading up to and past the Olympics. IT WAS THE MOST VOLATILE TIME IN MY STUDIES FOR RADAR BLAST AND BEAMS! This whole time was a HUGE experiment. On the day of the opening Ceremonies, in which Bush is to give an opening speech, 3 radars north of Salt Lake, HELD a weather pattern. I did save a lot of it but what I didn't save only would show more time of what I have. Those 3 radars had this plasma like look to them. All the energy circled the radars for the whole day. Until just before the ceremonies when they let go and all the energy seemed to drip down the US. Now the DOE's experiment over Salt Lake is sound evidence of a weather experiment folks. Those animations I provide show you all you need to see to get a good grasp. I have told you the points that control this. If you are not subscribed to weathertap.com I suggest you do. It will show you the electricity. It is the best there is! It will show you all the blast, beams, sparks, static etc.

My web page only has limited space so much of my proof sits on my computer and not on my web page so keep that in mind folks. Common sense dictates here. It does not take a large leap to believe weather modification is in place. Here are some titles on my site under PROOF.

[Links were not provided, just names of documents. Presumably the documents can be found on RadarMatrix.com[/url].

Letxa: "Two things here are of interest. One is that of "when the sources are terrestrial they are usually well-known to the radar operators, and keep appearing at the same angle." The other is that the sun is another potential source of radiation near sunrise and sunset which may create a "sharp line of echo"--or a "beam," so to speak."

Letxa: "Regarding "blast" or "nuclear explosion" images surrounding a given NEXRAD site: "Nicknamed "nuclear explosions" by some meteorologists, these patterns occur when the radar operator places the WSR88D doppler radar into a test or calibration mode. They are supposed to set the radar status to "offline" (in which case you'll see a message on the image saying so) but sometimes they don't, and you get the resulting circular test pattern sent to the radar distribution network. These are rare, and usually are gone within the hour. Don't worry, the radar operators don't usually conduct these tests during storm activity."

Letxa:

From: Billings MT NEXRAD Operator
To: letxa2000
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:07:11 -0600
Subject: Spokes Question

"Thanks for your question concerning the WSR-88D imagery from Billings, MT. We recently sent a team of engineers and technicians from our organization to Billings to determine the cause and resolution plan. This pattern is caused by interference from radars transmitting near the same frequency. We are taking action to change transmit frequencies in the area in order to avoid reoccurrence of the anomalous patterns.

Thank you for your interest in WSR-88D data and the quality of the data. Please contact me if you have additional questions."

Letxa (quoting NOAA radar operator): "Under certain atmospheric conditions and if the antennas of adjoining radars happen to be pointing at each other, it is possible for the sensitive receiver at one site to detect some of the energy from another radar even though they are tuned to different frequencies."

Letxa (quoting NOAA radar operator): "Multiple spokes occur because the beam from the other radars is very wide at long range and there are reflections of energy. The antennas of both radars are turning. This is a case of "ducting" where the radar beam is bent downward rather than propagating on a normal path of higher altitude. Not all interference is the same."

Letxa: "If one analyzes the "spoking" at Billings, one finds that the spokes occur at the same radials (angles) each time."

Letxa: "Spoking from Great Falls MT [Angles of Great Falls Anomaly snipped], Spoking from Riverton WY [Angles of Riverton Anomaly shipped].

On to Reno Nevada, boy could I show you some weird stuff from this radar! As for this response:

Letxa (quoting NOAA radar operator): "Spikes, wedges, strobes, starbursts and other anamolies can arise from other sources other than the sun, including aircraft, three-body scatterers such as large hail (this one actually says something about the severity of the storm), ground based - wireless - cable TV - and other transmissions, 88-D failures (usually temporary and associated with maintenance). Given the east direction of the spikes in your figures, the signals might be originating from transmissions from aircraft associated with flights out of the naval airbase in Fallon, although this is only speculation since I have no means to verify. I hope this explanation helps"

Letxa: According to GlobalSecurity.org, "The Fallon Range Training Complex (FRTC) is enclosed within a Military Operating Area (MOA) which overlays 6.5 million acres. Embedded within the MOA are four separate training ranges: Bravos 16, 17, 19, and 20; an integrated air defense system comprised of 37 real or simulated radars throughout the Dixie Valley area; and a supersonic flying area. The four ranges and various electronic warfare sites comprise 84,000 acres of withdrawn land (1.3% of the MOA). The entire FRTC is instrumented with a Tactical Aircrew Combat Training System (TACTS).""

As for the rest, I stated earlier that not all are doing something just as weather modification is NOT done every day. I think your term spoke is a bit off from what I am speaking of. I would term Billings and North Platte as spokes and the Nevada radars as full out Beams!

Letxa: SUMMARY OF DATA 1. The stations at Fairbanks and Anchorage--the two stations closest to HAARP--showed absolutely no "spoke" activity other than daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset. The lack of activity was mutually confirmed (Anchorage acted as verification for Fairbanks, and Fairbanks as verification for Anchorage).

Letxa: 2. Seattle--the station in the far northwest of the continental U.S. through which HAARP energy is supposed to pass--showed absolutely no spoke activity other than daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset. This was confirmed by the Portland OR station as well as the Spokane WA station.

Letxa: 3. Spoke activity at Billings MT was adequately explained by NOAA's operator of the Billings NEXRAD site. Occasional spokes represent interference from neighboring NEXRAD stations in Riverton WY and Great Falls MT.

Letxa: 4. No spoke activity was noted at radar stations that neighbor Billings (Glasgow MT and Riverton WY) at the times that Billings showed spoking. Nor, at any time, were spokes consistent with the Billings station observed in any of the neighboring stations.

Letxa: 5. Riverton WY--noted at RadarMatrix as part of the chain transmitting energy south along the Rocky Mountains--was completely without abnormal behavior. It showed absolutely no spoke activity other than daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset. This was confirmed by the Cheyenne WY station. Riverton was, in fact, one of the "cleanest" sites monitored.

Letxa: 6. Denver--also noted at RadarMatrix as part of the chain transmitting energy south along the Rocky Mountains--was without abnormal behavior.

Letxa: 7. Brownsville TX, San Antonio, and Corpus Christi all demonstrated a complete lack of spoking with the only spoke activity corresponding with daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles consistent with sunrise and sunset.

Letxa: 8. Reno NV displayed spoke activity that was consistent with aircraft operation at the Top Gun flight school at Fallon NAS. This was confirmed by taking spokes observed at the Elko station and superimposing them on the Reno radar image. The resulting spoke intersection was within the restricted airspace controlled by Fallon. 9. While no "blast" images were observed at any of the NEXRAD sites during this study, the explanation regarding tests and calibrations seems to adequately explain the blast-type images provided at RadarMatrix.

In closing: 2 weeks do not make up a study on what radars are up to..... unless something is up. No? Maybe next time I see something going down you could pump up your system and capture all this data for me. Also, Unless you watch weathertap, your not going to see a lot of the anomalies unless you watch all radars at all times. Weathertap is the best for showing the electricity and static in the air. It will also show you how Billings and North Platte spark in unison. Have someone explain that because this is a pure fact that has been happening for the last month or so. How can Billings' spark coinside with a North platte spark based off of their explination? And why only these 2? This shows another connection of electricity!

You cannot believe what a radar tech tells you or someone who is only programmed to read a screen. They are told what to say. Ask a radar tech how fried he would get sitting close to one of these radars. We are talking about electricity being thrown out into the air here. Lets discuss the electricity factor! I am suggesting that with 140 radars spinning out energy, GWEN towers and cell towers, coupled with chemtrails creates an enviroment of electricity in the sky. That there is a connection in this grid. Only a cerain few are players in controlling weather. When there is fog or cold dense air, radar become involved. Not all, but some. My previous post spells out the simplicity of control.

Your next study should be to get on CTTUSA chemtrail group and when someone post heavy spraying, you call their local news or local air traffic controller and ask them what those planes are that are spraying all those lines. You just may get lucky and find someone who will spill a thing or 2 about military exercises.

I would also like to see you get these people at Nexrad to explain each type of radar blast. Why some have cutout portions, why some look like electrical spokes, why the New Orleans and Long island one produce a "spiral graph" return. This should be interesting.

I came into this with pure speculation myself. It took me being outside on a clear blue day and watching these high flying white plane show up, by the dozens, and cloud my sky to finally wake up and study more. I lived right next to a major airport when i first started studying these high white planes. I could not believe that they were allowing all this taffic over an airport. I know that reality dictates that weather modification and Star Wars are real by virtue of the documents found on military sites and the publications. So the next question is how? Most of what I studied came from a specific time when certain things were going down. My views on things have changed from different theories thru the 3 years. Do me a favor and don't just study for 2 weeks. Try a year of studying your sky outside, locate your main radar and look in its direction. This is of course you see what looks to be chemtrails on a regular bases in your area. When big events happen like a Prominent Senator dying in a plane wreck, go check the satellite and radars. Especially pay close attention to everything come election time. Low Voter turnout is going to be needed for Bush on that night so watch and see how much rain/snow or even cold hits the US and see if you can correlate it to odd radar activity. Owning weather by the oil/energy trade is a cash cow. Just by making it cold a few days early in the fall will cause people to switch their thermostats from cool to heat. Even if it is on automatic you are now switched over to continue the milking of money. See the California Crisis for an example of this behavior.

This is my 2 cents. If you would like to go in depth email me at radarmatrix@aol.com and we can dig deeper!

Electricmojoman: Third would be that he explain why only Billings and North Platte shoot these things that I term "electrical fingers" No other radars do this!

I already explained why Billings has spokes.

I wasn't studying North Platte because I didn't see it as being of specific interest on your site--had I been aware it was of interest, I would have studied it, too. It may be nearby NEXRAD stations, interference from a new local radar or cell station, etc. Have you emailed the radar operator at North Platte to ask? If it happens often they're certainly aware of it and can probably give you an explanation.

Electricmojoman: Forth would be explaining why only 10% of the radar cause blast, which mostly happened around 2000 to the beginning of 2003. They have calmed down a whole lot now.

Electricmojoman: Also that he accepts that I have shown proof that a blast has actually sparked highs, lows and also those "magnetic strips" that are seen on Satellite.

That said, I'd want proof. A correlation is not itself proof unless a direct relation is demonstrated.

Electricmojoman: It is my belief that Billings is charging this line when it sparks southward.

Electricmojoman: My Report: This one is very easy to discredit. I have mentioned on my site that only 10% of the radars produce these blast. If what they say was true then all of the radars would do this at certain points and times. These blast do not just happen and go away. They go off for hours at a time. So unless the controller is sitting there flicking the switch then there is something else involved.

Perhaps the reduction in "blasts" is because more NEXRAD operators are being reminded to disable the feed from their radar when they're working on it.

Electricmojoman: We also need to note that if this energy is being blasted out and showing up on national radar then obviously the energy is real.

Electricmojoman: My report: This radar has been doing this for over 3 years and just now they are looking into it? The second problem is that it sparks in 2 directions. In the summer it will spark towards Alaska and in the winter it sparks southward. Though it will do both at different times.

As for why they are just now looking into it, I can't say. Perhaps they've been working on it since then. Make an adjustment, see how it does, try again, etc. The interference involves Riverton, Great Falls, and Billings and a lot of mountains. To suggest that it can be resolved by simply flipping a switch would be seriously underestimating the complexity of interference.

If you have a solution to completely eliminate RF interference you'll be a rich man, and not just in the radar industry.

Electricmojoman: By saying this I should assume that both of these radars, Great Falls and Riverton, would show a beam everytime Billings Sparks. I sincerely doubt this. Again, no other radars have this problem. Accept North Platte. If the Great Falls and Riverton radars are affecting this radar so much then I can only conclude that there is a power grid between them.

That Billings receives interference from Riverton and Great Falls does not automatically mean the reverse is true. Just like someone in New York might suddenly hear an AM radio station from Denver does not mean that someone in Denver will automatically be able to hear an AM radio station from New York. It doesn't work that way.

Electricmojoman: I would like to see these "spokes" from these radars that you speak of. They surely are not the Spokes that Billings is doing. Are you saying in this that the spokes, which seem to be evenly spaced, are hitting mountain tops? I think your refering to the echo beams that go off at sunrise and sunset.

What email address should I forward the images to? I'll be happy to send you the images. In fact, give me a day or two (when my wife isn't looking) and I'll throw them up on a Geocities site so everyone can see them.

Electricmojoman: this really just makes a point that they are militarized. We could come up with all kinds of conspiracies of what the Beams are for. The main question would be, why do all the radars in that are have a tendency to Beam at one another or cross their beams? I thought dopplar radar was a spinning mechanism that sends out radio waves. how do we get to beams in one direction?

Why do all the radars have a tendency to "beam at one another?" They don't! If that were the case when you see beams at Reno they'd be aimed directly at either Elko, Cedar City, or Las Vegas. That's not what we see. What we see is "beams" from these sites aimed at nothing in particular. Like you said, they "move around independently." Not once did I see a beam directly between any of the NEXRAD sites. With triangulation it was clearly coming from something mobile in the restricted area east of Reno.

Why do we see "beams" as a result of this activity? Many of the planes have their own radars and if just so happens that their radar is pointed directly at a NEXRAD site when the NEXRAD site is doing its scan, a beam will appear on NEXRAD. That's also why the beams move around--because the planes move around.

The activity at Reno and Elko is perfectly consistent with the radars picking up naval aircraft and completely inconsistent with the various NEXRAD sites "beaming between each other."

Electricmojoman: Also note that i have and animation of the Reno NV radar, in which you can see a distinct section of the radar move opposite the spin and then shoot out a large beam. Reno NV is a very very strange radar. At certain times it looks almost like a large underground satellite dish. it just sites there and hums with no rotation at all. And it is radiating a very large section of the ground. I do believe this one to be a weapon!

Electricmojoman: You should study the Unisys High and Low map and correlate how often you see fronts form along the Rockies and Decide wether or not Billing's Sparks are adding to that in some way. Not to mention all the radars along the rockies!

Electricmojoman: In closing: 2 weeks do not make up a study on what radars are up to unless something is up. no? Maybe next time I see something going down you could pump up your system and capture all this data for me.

If we do this, I would simply ask that you not monitor every site constantly. If you see something of interest, "turn it on" and then turn it off when you're done. Each site generates about 30MB of graphics per week and you'll eat up all my hard drive space and consume a lot of bandwidth if you leave it on constantly. But I'd be happy to move my radar collection script from my local machine to my Internet server so you can turn it on and off and we can look at the same data. Also if we do this I'd need a little time since I'd need to give the program a web interface--right now it's an ugly geek tool within Linux that runs in the background with no interface whatsoever.

I might even go one step further... as I mentioned earlier, I've become very interested in radars and am seriously considering focusing my software development career in that direction. As a first project I might be able to write a program that would automatically analyze each image as it is downloaded and only keep the ones that demonstrate some interesting anomaly. That's not a simple program to write, but it'd be an interesting challenge and might even help me get some resume fodder for a radar-related software job in the future.

Electricmojoman: You cannot believe what a radar tech tells you or someone who is only programmed to read a screen. They are told what they are. Ask a radar tech how fried he would get sitting close to one of these radars.

As for "sitting close to one of these radars," how close? As I said, I used to do flight training at Front Range Airport in Colorado and the Denver NEXRAD station was right there. The only thing we had to do was avoid flying into it (which I was successful at, I'm happy to say). But the NEXRAD tower itself was right there next to the tarmac and right outside the building of the flight training building. No-one got fried that I know of.

Electricmojoman: I would also like to see you get these people at Nexrad to explain each type of radar blast. Why some have cutout portions, why some look like electrical spokes, why the New Orleans and Long island one produce a "spiral graph" return. This should be interesting.

Electricmojoman: This is my 2 cents. If you would like to go in depth email me at radarmatrix@aol.com and we can dig deeper!

As of 2/7/2004 10:00pm CST I have re-started my program to capture images from Billings, Glasgow, North Platte and Hastings.

Electricmojoman: I would like to make note that you failed to answer my first basic question I asked. I find it hard to continue if someone will deny that weather modification has not been tried for years and that documents such as "Owning the Weather by 2025" are found on .MIL sites.

Electricmojoman: From there we can continue forward. I will also admit that your line of question was not very impressive. You skirt some basic questions and an ability to catch my drift. You may very well be too technical for your own good. Vice verse could be said for me.

Electricmojoman: A 2 week study for anomalies was a waste of time and hopefully not of someone's money. I layed out the specifics of radar control that is not found on my site. You cannot challenge those without a decent amount of daily watching and observing.

Electricmojoman: Radar anomalies at this juncture of the game are far and few. Billings, North Platte, Nevada and a few scattered blast are all that is caught. Your observation of calibrations holds no water. I heard that line early in the game and accepted it on face value by my own observation proved otherwise. I know for a fact that these blast have affected the air as well!

Electricmojoman: My common sense tells me that more than 10% need to be callibrated so under your view I should, in 3 years, seen those other radars be callibrated.

Electricmojoman: I presented enough stuff in my post for you to study. Such as the Olympics, the DOE experiments and the 4 ways weather is controlled.

Electricmojoman: You can either go in 2 directions here. You can believe that Star Wars and weather modification is not possible and walk away knowing you proved to yourself it is not true. Or you can spend time watching Satellite, Radars, The sky outside, Highs and lows and documenting blast/strange activity. I and many find direct correlations between the activity and current news.

Electricmojoman: This is paramount to me even wanting to waste my time taking on your sentence by sentence post.

Electricmojoman: You also DID neglect to answer whether you believe in weather modification or not. I am here to take you on but you need to show me that you accept real facts of the ENTIRE topic here before I go stepping into you anal retentive world of believe what NEXRAD tells you.

You have the process backwards. You cannot start with the "entire topic" (that you presumably believe is HAARP, chemtrails, weather control, etc.) and work back to the anomalies. You need to start with the radar anomalies and show that they couldn't be radar anomalies. Once you show that, then we open the possibilities to other explanations at which point we can consider the rest of your topic. But I refuse to be drawn into the whole HAARP-chemtrails-weather control debate until you've shown that the radar anonalies are not simply radar anomalies.

Electricmojoman: You jumped straight to my 3rd column and pick something to study that was a useless study.

Electricmojoman: ANYONE WHO LOOKS AT MY THIRD COLUMN WILL SEE A "MAGNETIC STRIP" CAUSED BY A BLAST. This means that blast affected the air so much that it generated a charge from the earth's positive sky.

Electricmojoman: Even after I gave you my 4 ingredients of weather control, which did not contain radar anomalies, you still are chomping at the bit to win on your NEXRAD ground. Even after I tell you that the anomalies have settled to a few places. Of which you would have known by asking me.

Electricmojoman: Now we are dealing with Billings and North Platte. Both are sparking in unison and many times a day. My common sense tells me that the unison part shows an electrical connection. No matter what your view is of why one is doing it, you have to explain it for both and then why they go off at the same time.

Electricmojoman: The week that California had a huge earthquake and mad cow showed up in WA state, I caught a radar blasting in Northern California for 24-48 hours. This was before the earth quake. I have all kinds of correlations. Of which I would have gladly shown you but I don't think your coming into this with a correct mindset.

Electricmojoman: I am not here to prove you wrong, you're here to prove me wrong so lets get the structure straight. As far as I am concerned, class is in session and the people viewing need to know your views on other things. If you do not believe in weather modification, or chemtrails, or the power and uses for HAARP, then you are a disinformant. Be it paid or just cuz you're bored.

Electricmojoman: As for the "No Radar Image Available" I have a whole host of blast animations that never showed that. In fact, most sit there and blast away, while rotating mind you.

Like I said, if they calibrate their radars correctly, they disable the radar feed when they do so. That will result in a "No Radar Image Available" which I was able to see during my study. In fact, I got one from Hastings this morning (2/8/2004 05:42 CST). I suspect the reason you used to see lots of blasts and now you see fewer is because the radar operators have been reminded that they need to disable the radar feed when calibrating them. Hence you'll now normally see "No Radar Image Available" rather than blasts.

Again, I'd like to know what you mean by "while rotating."

Electricmojoman: I never stated that all blast affect the air and I can clearly state that many could just be calibrations.

Electricmojoman: but you might want to go and research the calibration part. It involves sending out higher strength signals to map out the echoes. If you go outside and shoot a cap gun the echo is not going to go very far, if you go out and shoot a cannon you can get quite a distance in your echo.

Electricmojoman: I only came to the conclusion that the blast could be used by finding correlation's to High, lows and many other things just as the jetstream sticking right above a radar that would be blasting for 2 or 3 days.

Electricmojoman: If you do not believe it you should walk on. Most people in here understand that my work and the chemtrail activity is a conspiratorial view. I said at the outset that I am no scientist. If you scientific mind concludes I'm insane in the membrane..then walk on home man!

Electricmojoman: I wonder how many other places you posted your limited study! Hmmmmm And I do believe you made some comments about me being anonymous to.

I don't believe I made any comments about you being anoymous.

Electricmojoman: By the way, I do have a yahoo group for all who might want to join. If you set up your account to receive emails you will be able to see my daily or weekly findings. I send animations from Weathertap and even blast and beams that I catch. If anything I have become really good at predicting weather=)

It is too bad I cannot post a picture inside my post. If there is a way let me know.

I do have specific evidence of lows and high popping up after a blast. The previously mentioned "magnetic strip" that came AFTER the blast, struck that radar. You cannot argue it! Now either you accept that energy just hit the radar and caused it or you accept that a blast sparked energy to it. There is no skirting that.

There is no skirting the connection to Billings and North Platte sparking in Unison. That is an electrical connection! People with common sense will get that!

As for Wolf.....your just a mouth! Your verbal assult adds to jack crap because your no scientist so don't even try and play like you have a clue!

I mean how retarded do you have to be to sit in a forum you don't believe in?

Believe it or not Wolf, I could have wiped the floor clean by taking your post on. Your an easy target!

Are you 2 joined at the hip? Because I gotta say, the whole point by point (gotta win on every point) tactic....it so tiring. I do remember once dating a woman who would completely avoid my whole email message and just find one sentence to score a point on. That is what it reminds me of. I mean what am I suppose to do...knit pick your knit picking so that you can knit pick my knit picking of your knit picking. It would be a knit picking nightmare!

Imagine that post my friends. I think we would all get lost.

I honestly do not care what either of you think. I took the time, at the request of people in here to respond. If my views don't add up then fly fly away! Electricmojo is a moron I quite! big freakin deal! I truely believe this is my cause in life. Electricity is increasing a lot now a days. People and animals are starting to be affected by it. Especially in the winter time when air is as cold and dense as it has been lately. I believe that Radars are adding to the current of electricity. If you don't believe so then your case is made for you. Not me. I did not base my views off of radar anomalies alone, There is a whole system involved that stems from coming to a belief that chemtrails are real and trying to understand what they were for. I then preceeded to find documentation and Patents that can not be argued against. Plain and simple. From there I waited and watched for 3 years and over that time I have correlated evidence to my theories. Sorry if you have not seen them all but I have a life as well.

I cannot sit here and make proof out of words. I have some 3 CDs of animations of the last 3 years. I know what I see.

If you believe weather modification never happened and JFK was shot by one man....so be it.

I will take your post Lex and mine and probably add it to my site. I think the back and forth postings speak for themselve and at the least you put up a decent arguement. I have no problem letting the 2 sides be seen and letting people decide. However, i will add animations that you have not seen and I will take my case further. Your free to do the same!

As for Wolf.....boohoo! Did the big bad conspiracy guy hurt your feelings? Did I ruin you chemtrail post experience? Again, how big of a loser do you have to be to sit on a board you have no belief in and talk crap all day? that spells Super loser!

Wolf Larson: That is all for now. I look forward to your answers, but I won't hold my breath waithing for you to actually address them. Like most hoaxters you will avoid the questions with a personal attack or an attempt to change the subject.

So your damn right I will you moron!

Electricmojoman: You also need to know that words are not facts. If we are going to get into this in-depth, then I need to be able to send you data and you need to be signed up for weathertap.

As for sending me data, I think the best way would be to simply place it on some part of your website that I (and others) can access. Sending images via email is not optimum and sending it directly to me via email will exclude everyone else that may be interested in the topic.

Electricmojoman: Your also going to have to open your mind up to an over all view of electricity in the air.

Electricmojoman: As for trying to hold people back from a 3 day conclusion, well, that is very hipocritical on your part. You did a 2 week study and came to conclusions! If I had not stepped in your conclusion would have stood. So you should admit as much!

Electricmojoman: If you are not going to get weathertap and cannot recieve emails then I am not going to waste my time.

I can receive emails, I just prefer this whole debate to remain public.

Electricmojoman: Weathertap is very different. Regardless of who is running them. The electricity shows up 10 times better on national radars so that you know which radars are pumping out more energy. Not anomalies...but real energy. Not calibrations either. Also weathertap allows you to save the animations. I'm not sure how you saved your images from the NOAA but I would guess that they are screen prints. Without weathertap, your not going to know where to look unless you waste everyday looking at every radar.

During my study I reviewed each of the 55,666 images manually. Yes, it was time-consuming. No, I'm not going to do that anymore. I'm currently writing a program that will automatically detect anomalies in the images downloaded directly from NOAA so I don't have to manually find them. The program itself will automatically notify me of every anomaly in the country.

Also, you should be aware that the national radar that WeatherTap (or NOAA, for that matter) presents is a composite image of the latest images available from all NEXRAD sites. That doesn't mean that it takes a "picture" of how everything looked at a given instant. Each NEXRAD site is updating independently every 5-10 minutes. So when you look at your national radar you might being seeing an image that consists of an image from Billings at 2:41PM and an image from North Platte at 2:39PM and an image from Reno at 2:37pm. When your national radar shows any number of sites "beaming" at the "same time," it's not really the exact same time. It's an overall image of the data returned by each NEXRAD site "sometime within the last 10 minutes."

If you're looking at a national radar map and have concluded that certain sites are synchronized in their "beaming" you are very mistaken. That's why you need to be looking at individual NEXRAD images because they tell you the time they were taken. And even then, it's only accurate to the nearest minute so even if two sites say 2:41pm (they're actually in UTC) you don't know if they were both taken at 2:41.00 or maybe a few seconds apart. In fact, it's almost certain that they weren't prepared at the exact same second.

Electricmojoman: I will eventually make my points on my own time but not to prove a very narrow search into anomalies. You need to spend time on that yourself. Your really not tempting me to go further to be honest. Your putting up walls and limitations all the way.

Will you be getting back to me on the 4 questions I asked you in my previous post?

Electricmojoman: You just plainly stated that you proved my radar anomaly theory wrong. So why the need to debate. Score yourself a point and go party with it.

Electricmojoman: Any reasonable person can conclude from our exchange that, even in your technical world of limited debate on radar anomalies and you narrow ability to get the resources or accept my resources is paramount to your need to not be proven wrong. Your basically trying to cage me in or box me into a corner so that you can finally find a "AHA, I gotcha!" A good tactic but I am a much wiser man.

Electricmojoman: Most people don't have the time or need to go studying every little detail.

Electricmojoman: Don't go badgering people. Do you see me all over the plae trying to force my view down people's throats? No.

Electricmojoman: Lex, you do not have the capability to research this on it's merits. Plain and simple. You lack common sense as well.

1. All the radar anomalies I have seen have been explained as common radar anomalies both by technical literature and by radar operators. Common sense dictates that unless someone can provide an explanation of why they aren't common radar anomalies, then they most probably are common radar anomalies. I've asked questions that might lead me to conclude that they weren't just radar anomalies, but no-one has answered the questions.

2. If I ask a question of a supposed expert and they complain about being cornered in a box, it's because they know their answers will cause them to be cornered in a box. This is tacit acknowledgement of a failure in the theory, your confidence in it, and/or your fear of being wrong.

3. That if the the most notable contribution of "the expert" has been name-calling when I have not once called anyone a name or been insulting, that that expert doesn't have much to contribute to the discussion.

Common sense? I'd have to suspend common sense to believe you right now.

Electricmojoman: I have no problem knowing that there are holes in my theories but my over all understanding is pretty darn good. I have spent the last 3 years of my life in this very deeply. You have not.

Electricmojoman: Your limited entrance into this arena should humble your ego down a notch.

Electricmojoman: You can talk till your blue in the face, or at least type on every sentence, but your not ready for this debate. Just on the radar anomalies alone, I could send so many questions your way you would lose yourself and your credibility because I feel you have an answer for everything.

Ask your radar anomaly questions. Humble me. Embarass me. But if you can do it without name-calling it'd be much appreciated. Thank you.

Electricmojoman: Someday I will put more of my work on my site and explain further and then you can run free on those radar anomalies. But like I said, unless you have weathertap, your not gonna see which ones are highly active. It is just a plain fact. I have 3 years of watching weather under my belt so give me some credit here. Your view that NOAA national is the same IS false. Anyone who looks at the 2 national radars can see that. Just chalk that one up to another false belief not supported by fact.

Electricmojoman: Radar anomalies go far far beyond the blast. I only added the blast because they were so prevalent a while back. Again from only 10% of radars. Quite often from those. So that was a whole lot of calibration that the other 90% never got in 3 years and a whole lot of calibration for the 10%. Use your common sense here. That should tell you something about those radars! I could show you all kind of different acting radars. Of which would all need to be explained for their different returns at different times.

"However, when the data distribution was decentralized, and the Next Generation Weather Radar (NEXRAD) Information Dissemination Service (NIDS) contract ended, near real-time radar data began showing up on Internet in its more basic, unfiltered form. This provided individuals and businesses with unfettered access to this information. Unfortunately, the majority of these users had little or no training to determine the quality of the data they were using." (Source)

Electricmojoman: If this is your chosen pigeon hole then peck away. I'm not going to say you lost the challenge but you lost my respect and interest. I have given you enough to go on your own. Be free!