There is no evidence of this whatsoever.
At the beginning of this Fall we had a very bad cold
spell in the US. It was WAY to early to get that kind of cold but this was the
system that brought it in. HAARP was pulsing at the time.
And my cat was hanging on the screen door at the time, but that doesn't mean that
my cat caused the cold spell. The implication he is making here is that it seemed
that we had a cold spell earlier than usual (in his opinion) and HAARP was operating
at the time so he concludes HAARP caused it. But there is no more evidence that HAARP
caused this than my cat.
Especially considering that we've already established that HAARP operates in the
ionosphere at altitudes in the neighborhood of 60km while the jet stream exists
at 8-12 miles (12.8 to
19.2km). In other words, the area of the atmosphere where HAARP does its work is
3 times higher than the jetstream. It is unclear why he thinks that
HAARP's work at 60km has any effect on the jetstream at 20km.
HAARP also can Attract the jetstream up from the gulf.
Much like a magnet. Obviously this is my belief and not scientific.
That much we can agree on. It's not scientific.
As for the connection from HAARP to the radars I have stepped
back from that view for now. Accept when I see Billings Spark the "Electrical fingers"
in HAARPS direction. I see a lot more correlation and connection between the 2 in summer
time when the vacuum swells become so huge that, at the peak of the vacuum, the whole US
will fire up storms. From top to bottom. I do believe HAARP has a help in drawing the
vacuum harder.
Here he is basically saying that he's abandoned (for now) the view that there is a connection
between HAARP and the radars, except for when it fits the data--i.e., apparently when
he sees spoking in Billings then it is important.
He also makes some mention about storms "firing up" in the summer and that HAARP is
somehow drawing this unidentified vacuum, apparently causing the summer storms. But
anyone who has lived in the U.S.--especially just east of the Rocky Mountains--know that
summer storms, especially in the afternoon, are nothing new. There is no logical reason
to believe that the summer thunderstorms that have been a part of North America since
it was settled are now somehow being caused by HAARP or radars in Billings or North
Platte.
If you ever see a gravity map of the US, you will see that
gravity is the greatest over Alaska (where HAARP is) and down the Rocky Mountains.
Gravity and magnetism are very closely related. The earth has a north and south pole
and a magnetic structure around it. The way you make a magnet is by running a direct
current thru something. Anything can be magnetised! Weather included.
Especially with Barium and metals thrown in. Electrical
lines have a magnetic field. The mountains being so high up and more gravity means that
more electricity build up along this ridge. Many Many times you will see a front start
on the mountains. Energy gets back up here.
Again, he's dropping reference to the "chemtrails" conspiracy when he talks about barium
being thrown in.
Beyond that, it is not clear what he means by "energy getting backed up" on the mountains.
Apparently he thinks the mountains are so high as to provide some kind of barrier for
electricity. It's not clear whether he thinks this is a barrier for energy in the
ionosphere (which would be strange since the Rocky Mountains do not exceed 5km in height
which is far below the ionosphere) or a barrier for weather (which is far below
the ionosphere in which HAARP operates).
Basically, the previous paragraph makes so little sense I don't even know how to
analyze it.
It is my belief that Billings is charging this line when
it sparks southward. Which in the last few months I would guestimate that this radar
has sparked south on average 3 times a day. Easily! Again, only Billings and North
Platte do these kinds of returns on a regular bases. This is fact! I save animations
every day!
So now he's saying that the Billings NEXRAD site (pictured to the right) is somehow
"charging" this wireless electrical line in the ionosphere 60km above it. No matter
that, as we can see, there are no heavy-duty industrial power lines leading to the
Billings site. No matter that it is not explained how a NEXRAD radar, which consists
of a 28 foot dish, is capable of receiving or transmitting energy into the ionosphere
that an entire network of antennas is required to do at HAARP in Alaska (pictured to
the left).
Now for the main control...LOWS. Take some time and watch the Colorado Ridge. When a
low gets stuck on this ridge the vacuum will increase its size and power. This last
system we had was all controlled from that one low. From that juncture it allows
moisture to be pulled up from the gulf and collide with the cold fronts. Often times
you will see the "question mark" effect of weather that spreads from Texas all the way
north into a loop. 3 times last year we had hurricane size lows go across the US. They
all started on the ridge. It was only last year that I noticed this ridge of radars
flare up on purpose!
Here, as best I can tell, he is describing weather phenomenon and patterns that are
very well known. There is nothing suspicious about moisture being pulled up from the
Gulf of Mexico through tornado alley, causing tornados. In Colorado,
"upslope conditions"
that bring moisture in from the southeast are also well-known and bring very wet, heavy
snow into Colorado during the winter. There is nothing spectacular about what he is
describing.
He then goes on to suggest that some radars "flaring up on purpose" has something to do
with this. There is no basis, however, for this conclusion. Again, just because two things
happen at or near the same time doesn't mean one caused the other. In fact, assuming he is
right and that certain radars "flared up" at about the same time, I would suggest that it is
entirely more probable that the low pressure systms were accompanied by changing
atmospheric conditions which caused radar refractions and signal bending which are known
causes of these types of anomalies.
From there I believe a low can be steered from radar to radar.
Especially in this extremely cold dense air. Cold Dense Air is supper conductive. Many
of you will notice the amount of shocks you get during this time. The electrical field
is right on top of you.
There is nothing particularly conductive about cold dense air. Shocks you receive are
simply static electricity. They are common when the air is dry or humidity low
(source). There
is nothing "right on top of you." In fact if by "dense" he means full of humidity, he
is precisely wrong. But perhaps "dense" means "high pressure." Again, it's really
hard to understand his theory.
In the document "Owning the weather by 2025," fog was a big part
of what they wanted to create. One reason is to be hidden but the main part is because
fog is so highly conductive to electricity and EMP's (electrical magnetic pulses). In
the fog you have radars, cell towers, GWEN towers and so on adding electricity around
you. When Wellstone's plane went down it was in this type of environment.
It would seem he is entirely backwards. According to
this site,
"When the air is humid, water molecules can collect on the surface of various
materials. This can prevent the build-up of electrical charges. The reason has to
do with the shape of the water molecule and its own electrical forces. Thus, static
electricity is formed much better when the air is dry or the humidity is low."
Further, the Wellstone
crash occured in "visibility of about 2 miles, with snow showers and a
cloud ceiling of about 700 feet". Not fog.
Many of you who have visited my site know that I personally
caught the "magnetic strip" that sparked as his plane went down. It showed up on
Satellite and those 2 little prongs went on both sides of the airport. That is more
than a coincidence! There is a Professor Fetzer from Minnesota that is claiming that
Wellstone's plane was taken out by an EMP. I believe this to be true and I have sent
Wellstone's lawyers and family my findings! This also brings into focus what the Deceased Astronauts discovered before they died.
They were the first of ALL the astronauts to discover "Red Arcs of Light" circling the
earth. Just little red strips firing away. NO OTHER ASTRONAUT has witnessed these! I
believe they witnessed Star Wars in action. I believe that the "magnetic strip" I
caught for Wellstone are the exact same things they discovered!
The magnetic strips that he claims to have observed, and which he has made available
here,
appear to be an anomaly in the image just like the radar anomalies he analyzes are no
more than radar anomalies. The "rings" cover thousands of square miles across the northern
U.S. and southern Canada. In reality, this is a simple anomaly and it is a
coincidence.
Further, Wellstone's plane crashed on October 25th, 2002 at
10:20am Central Daylight Time. The
image provided on RadarMatrix with the "magnetic strips" has a date/time stamp of
"0515Z 25 OCT 02". That is "05:15 Zulu" and Zulu is the same as UTC which is 5 hours ahead
of Central Time during Daylight Savings Time. So the magnetic strip anomaly pictured at
RadarMatrix actually occured at 12:15am Central Time, over 10 hours before Wellstone's plane
went down. For some reason I don't think that Wellstone's lawyers or family will be too interested
in his findings.
Professor Jim Fetzer is a professor at the
University of Minnesota in the Department of Philosophy. In addition to his theories
regarding the Wellstone crash, you can also read his
conspiracy theories
regarding the Space Shuttle Columbia, new takes on the JFK assassination, and his anti-war
rhetoric regarding Iraq. This man may be a professor but he's a big-time
conspiracy theorist, too. His theories regarding Wellstone are not surprising nor particularly
credible.
In the summer time watch a radar in Texas located at Dyess AFB.
It sits smack dab in-between the most volatile air on earth. Tornado Alley. In this region
a radar can actually ignite long lines of storms. Last year I caught this radar triggering
storms for almost 48 hours. There was no activity on the radar accept from it's center
northwards. it looked like a match with fire coming off it!
Once again, he seems to be engaging in a very backwards take on "cause and effect." He says
that this radar sits right in the middle of the most volatile air on earth (Tornado Alley)
and then goes on to blame the creation of long lines of storms on the radar rather than
the volatile air. This makes no sense whatsoever.
These are some random views so I will let you all chomp on
them for a while. I have had many people try and discredit me and none have come close
to convincing me otherwise. My belief is solid because I do stem my work from the
point of common sense that our military wants to control the weather. George Washington
himself won a battle by attacking in the dead of winter. Which was unheard of back then.
So even in the earliest times of America, weather has been a factor of war. It is a great
asset and it can be a great Burden.
No-one argues that weather control would be cool. But he certainly hasn't made any
believable case that it is being accomplished today and certainly not in the manner he
is describing.
I did also call my local news channel and had one
guy tell me point blank that the chemtrail activity was the military doing exercises. As you
could imagine, my mouth dropped!
I'd very much like to know which "local news channel" and the name of the person he talked
to. Given that information, I'd give him a call and verify that. The news person could
have thought he was talking about "chaff" that military planes often
dispense during training exercises. We don't know exactly what this person asked and exactly
how the news person responded. Without that information, this is just hearsay.
I think 911 is allowing this to continue under
the security perception! Obviously our representatives and American's would not be so
keen on knowing the Government can control weather which is why we have ENRONS. They
are a front to milk money to pay for this.
While he claims that Americans would not be "keen on knowing the Government" can control
the weather, I see no reason to believe this. We're not talking about ET contact and
society-shattering or religion-shaterring contacts with beings from another planet.
We're talking about weather control. This is just "seeding clouds" but with advances
in technology. His claim that Americans would be upset to know that the government
could control the weather and, thus, must be made secret seems rather silly. The general
population is fine with people seeding clouds to try to make it rain, why would they be
upset if the government could actually make it work?
It's also neat how he brought in semi-current events (Enron) to somehow support his
theory. This is a common strategy of conspiracy theories. Everything means
something and is somehow tied to the conspiracy. Even corporate bankruptcies,
apparently.
The Patents for HAARP are sitting in the
hands of OIL/ENERGY firms. Our government right now is being ran by the same people.
Enron was Bush's number one contributor. His father was the spokesman for Star Wars.
They own it and few people know the true reality of what it is.
Once again, we're reaching here. First, even if oil/energy firms hold the patents on
HAARP, so what? Apparently the purpose (according to them) of HAARP is to modify the
weather, cause earthquakes (I've read that on some conspiracy site), and to provide
an SDI-style missile defense. What in the world would oil/energy firms want with this
technology? This whole Bush/Enron/Oil firm/HAARP tie-in is shaky at best and, even
if true, doesn't seem to add up to anything.
Star Wars and this electrical grid has its place if and
when a nuke comes at us. Being
that true missile defense comes from creating an atmosphere were you can send out an
EMP and discharge the electronics of the missile. This is all Tesla 101 and is also
common sense. The whole "bullet to Bullet" defense is a joke and a smoke screen!
Fortunately, nukes are not an everyday occurrence. So weather control best suits
their money making ways.
So, basically, they're saying that HAARP was supposed to provide a missile defense but
since that doesn't happen very often and they can't make money off of it, they want to
make money off of controlling the weather. Right. Talk about dual-use technology. :)
See ENRON and what they did to California for justification.
That was on the heels of one of the hottest summers ever. That summer they did not
have one blackout because Jim Jeffords switch parties and gave Dems subpoena power.
Then Enron Fell! Chemtrails and the layers of crap that it creates will trap in
UV rays. This may very well be what Global warming is from! I have actually witnessed
a full campaign of spraying only to see the planes disappear and the sandy substance
left behind get cooked away. On those night I could taste a chlorine/metallic taste
in the air. When this happened I would stare at the stars as if I were looking thru
a magnifying glass. I honestly wonder about this affect on us. Especially when the sun
is out!
There's a lot of comments here, not much worth responding too, though. But apprently
now the California energy problem is also due to this whole HAARP/NEXRAD conspiracy
and maybe even causing global warming.
As for a chlorine/metallic taste in the air, wow... I've never been able to taste
air before, and I've been to Mexico City! Perhaps he should call the EPA. :)
In all seriousness, one can't really refute his claims regarding what he felt or
tasted. But this goes along with the chemtrail conspiracy that claims that some
contrails make people sick. This has been disproven inasmuch as the chemtrail claims
have not been able to prove a causal relationship between contrails and the sickness.
After all, people get sick all the time, contrails occur virtually every day, and
contrails occur about 5 or 6 miles higher than the altitude at which most of us live.
They have been unable to conduct a "clean" study that has proper scientific controls and
which excludes other possible causes for the sickness.
That's not to say people can't get sick because of contrails. We all know that the
mind is a very powerful thing and hypochondriacs can and do truly feel ill when there is
nothing physically wrong with them. Mental suggestion is very real. Based on the lack
of scientific evidence regarding contrails making people sick, it is more probable that
people that choose to believe this essentially are engaged in self-suggestion such that
they think they should be sick, so their mind causes them to feel sick.
But this isn't a physical problem so much as a psychological one
(Source).
Chemtrails are real and anyone who sits and watch a clear blue sky get over cast from
these high flying planes knows the truth. I have video taped it one to many times
and correlated it with "NASA's contrail prediction program" (also located on my site)
and it never lines up. The humidity is low and in many of my videos I tape regular
planes that are on the SAME PLAIN and one will have a normal contrail and the other
goes from skyline to skyline and fans out. I know what I see and when you type
"Chemtrails" into google, 50,000 pages can't just be a conspiracy!
Actually, 50,000 pages can be "just a conspiracy theory." Last I heard there
were something like 3 billion pages cataloged in Google. That means that 1 out of
every 60,000 pages references chemtrails (many of which are arguing against them, of
course!). If 1 out of every 60,000 people believes in something, yes, that would
probably qualify as a conspiracy theory.
On the note of chemtrails, The 2002 winter Olympics was one of the first MAJOR
weather experiments I documented. I suggest you check it out on my web page. Read about
how the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Research Program (why the DOE is involved in
weather is a mystery) but read how they performed test over Salt Lake by spraying
"perfluorocarbon tracers" over the area. It was a major experiment! Perfluorocarbon
tracers have been put inside the new 20 dollar bills and possibly others to trace large
sums of money from satellite. You wanna talk about being marked well here is a starting
place to study! Watch the whole series of animations leading up to and past the Olympics. IT WAS THE MOST
VOLATILE TIME IN MY STUDIES FOR RADAR BLAST AND BEAMS! This whole time was a HUGE
experiment. On the day of the opening Ceremonies, in which Bush is to give an opening
speech, 3 radars north of Salt Lake, HELD a weather pattern. I did save a lot of it but
what I didn't save only would show more time of what I have. Those 3 radars had this
plasma like look to them. All the energy circled the radars for the whole day. Until
just before the ceremonies when they let go and all the energy seemed to drip down the
US.
First, it is no mystery why the Department of Energy is involved in weather research
programs. From this document,
the reason is: "For nearly 50 years, the Department of Energy and its predecessors,
the Atomic Energy Commission and the Energy Research and Development Administration, have
established and supported meteorological operations and atmospheric research at the DOE
field offices. The need for meteorological services began in 1944 with the development,
fabrication, and testing of atomic weapons and the national security and safety issues
associated with them. Meteorological program requirements were subsequently augmented by
the passage of environmental protection legislation, which is enforced by the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), and by several DOE orders that specify requirements for
meteorological services to protect public health and safety and the environment."
I saw (I think) his study on the 2002 Olympics. I say "I think" because his site is so
poorly organized that it's hard to say with certainty whether I studied the right section
or whether he had other information on the topic somewhere else. But based on what I saw
I saw nothing out of the ordinary. It amounted to normal weather patterns. He somehow
attributes the fact that a weather system moved the way it did because of some anomalies
he saw on radar, but there is no evidence to suggest that radars were the cause of it.
In fact, such a conclusion is completely unwarranted given the fact that he has provided
no explanation or proof of how a NEXRAD station could modify the weather. The fact that
weather changes near a NEXRAD station is no more proof that NEXRAD is responsible than
my house being responsible when weather changes near it.
Now the DOE's experiment over Salt Lake is sound evidence of a weather experiment
folks. Those animations I provide show you all you need to see to get a good grasp. I
have told you the points that control this. If you are not subscribed to weathertap.com
I suggest you do. It will show you the electricity. It is the best there is! It will show
you all the blast, beams, sparks, static etc.
There is no evidence provided and the animations reflect weather patterns that are not
particularly interesting. It is also strange that a secret government weather-modification
program would be tested and made visible before the entire world at such a public event.
Again, even if there was anything suspicious about the weather patterns during the Olympics
(there wasn't) the suggestion that a secret military capability would be used to influence
the weather for a public civilian event is illogical.
My web page only has limited space so much of my proof sits on my computer and not on
my web page so keep that in mind folks. Common sense dictates here. It does not take a
large leap to believe weather modification is in place. Here are some titles on my site
under PROOF.
Common sense does dictate--it dictates that we not make any leap (let alone
a large one) without sound and scientific reasoning. The entire case Electricmojoman made above is based on what he
himself admits is his "belief and not scientific". Yet he asks that we keep in
mind that he hasn't provided all the evidence because his web page has limited space. You
would think that his web page, dedicated to promoting this theory, would contain at least
sufficient information to draw a rational conclusion. It does not.
His website is a collection of radar and satellite imagery with links to a lot of conspiracy
documents thrown in for good measure. He does not make any scientifically convincing case
that the radar and satellite imagery are suspicious nor that the radars have anything to do
with the movement of weather patterns (they don't).
In short, none of the claims made above are based on science. They seemed to be based
on speculation, a conspiracy-theory state of mind, and a little bit of Hollywood science
fiction.
My report: There are only 2 radars that are very active right now.
One being Billings MT and the other being North Platte NE. In between you will find some
activity out of the 3 radars in Nevada beaming. One cannot just up and study all radars
that I speak of ,in such a short time, and come to a conclusion or expect activity. To
do so would be to conclude that weather modification is a daily thing. It is not! I
posted my BILLINGS challenge because it is the most active and lately it has been going
absolutely bonkers!
I have completely explained the Billings anomalies.
Additionally, I never claimed nor assumed that he claimed that all radars exhibited
this kind of activity. I specifically monitored other radar sites to serve as a
"control" on the experiment. You can't make conclusions based only on those sites that
you believe are acting strangely--you must monitor other sites to establish a baseline
comparison.
[Regarding "blast" or "nuclear explosion" anomalies being
calibrations] This one is very easy to discredit. I have mentioned on my site that only
10% of the radars produce these blast. If what they say was true then all of the radars
would do this at certain points and times. These blast do not just happen and go away.
They go off for hours at a time. So unless the controller is sitting there flicking
the switch then there is something else involved.
Again, he seems to contradict himself. He said that the blasts don't just happen and go away
but rather last for "hours at a time." He then suggets that that could only be explained if
a controller was "flicking the switch." In reality, the fact that he says these radars used
to exhibit this "blast" anomaly for hours at a time confirms the conclusion that they were probably
calibrations. If they constantly appeared and disappeared from image to image, that would be
strange. If they appear, as he says, for hours at a time, that would be consistent with an
operator working on a radar calibration problem over several hours and simply forgetting to
take the radar offline first.
We also need to note that if this energy is being blasted out
and showing up on national radar, then obviously the energy
is real.
No, "national radar" is a composite of individual radars. That means the national
radar is made up of the data from each individual radar. The fact that the anomalies are
present on national radar doesn't mean "the energy is real"--it simply confirms the fact that
the national radar image is made up of the smaller radar images, each of which can present
anomalies.
I preceeded to prove that fact, in my 3rd column, by showing
these blast were
affecting the air with a blast causing a Low and a blast sparking a "magnetic strip."
This conclusion is not based in logic nor science. At best he is showing a correlation.
But a correlation does not prove the radars caused a low pressure system or sparked a
"magnetic trip." In short, he has proved nothing.
As for the Beams, one needs to study Nevada radars. In
particular Reno Nevada! Which I believe to be a weapon of some sort! You will not
catch many others sending out a beam accept on rare occassion.
I agree that Reno presents a very interesting set of anomalies. However,
I thoroughly explained them in the link just cited and in the study to which electricmojoman
is replying.
In a sense the anomalies are caused by weapons: fighter aircraft doing combat training
at the Top Gun school at Fallon NAS. The anomalies are caused by aircraft moving independently
in restricted airspace and occasionally illuminating the NEXRAD radar with the radar on their
own aircraft.
One final problem here
is the different types of blast. Someone saying that it is just from a person switching
modes is one thing but now they would need to explain each type. And I mean to tell you
there is a lot of explaining to do here! As for ground clutter and flocks of birds.....
it is one of the funnier things I have heard. Like I said, only 10% show these blast so
apparently the other 90% do not have birds or ground clutter problems!
I never said that all anomalies are caused by birds,
ground clutter, or calibration tests. There are other sources of anomalies, as any radar
operator knows. This site is currently working to document and explain all know anomalies on the
anomaly introduction page. Over time we will try to
document more and more of them.
[In regards to Billings anomaly] This radar has been doing
this for over 3 years and just now they are looking into it? The second problem is that
it sparks in 2 directions. In the summer it will spark towards Alaska and in the winter
it sparks southward. Though it will do both at different times also. If you all get a
chance, check out a relief map of the US and how the Rockies go around Billings. I
also do remember seeing a 60 minutes, or something to that affect, talking about the
energy corruption in Billings. This would be a good place to do some investigating as well!
He suggests that it is suspicious that the Billings anomaly has not been resolved in 3 years.
Interference such as this is a complicated issue and isn't solved just by flipping a
switch. While we would all like to see radars working perfectly 100% of the time, that's
often just not possible. Regardless, our study of the Billings anomaly showed that it only
presented an anomaly 2.6% of the time. That is certainly more than adequate to monitor the
weather. Unfortunately, anything more than 0% failure can be used by some people to
demonstrate a conspiracy.
The fact that it spokes in two directions is not suspicious since the interference itself
is known to come from both Great Falls MT ("towards Alaska") and Riverton WY ("southward").
[Regarding conditions that cause anomalies at Billings]
Why is this and North Platte the only ones having this problem? And several times a
day every day of the week and every week of the month?
Again, his question is incorrectly phrased. The question isn't why these are the only
radars with this problem. The question is why these radars have this problem.
I already explaiend the Billings anomaly and am currently
running a study on the North Platte anomaly.
[Regarding Billings anomaly caused by Great Falls and Riverton
NEXRAD sites] By saying this I should assume that both of these radars, Great Falls and Riverton,
would show a beam everytime Billings Sparks. I sincerely doubt this.
This logic is flawed. Just because Great Falls and Riverton cause interference for Billings
doesn't mean Billings would cause interference for them. Just like an AM radio station in
Denver might be heard some evening in New York City doesn't mean that a station from New
York City will necessarilly be audible the same night in Denver. It doesn't work that way.
Again, no other radars have this problem. Accept North Platte.
If the Great Falls and Riverton radars are affecting this radar so much then I can only
conclude that there is a power grid between them.
This conclusion is downright humorous. We might as well say that if your cell phone is causing
interference with your computer's speakers that you can only conclude that there is some kind
of power grid between them. It's interference, nothing more! This is not evidence of a
"power grid" between anything.
This is a good example of a conspiracy theorist jumping to illogical conclusions based on
both a lack of information and a lack of knowledge of the topic.
[Regarding the spokes of the Billings anomaly appearing at
constant angles] Not true, at this particular point it is but a two weeks study of time. Which is not
much time to make a valid statement on this. Again, if this radar is sparking energy
towards the mountains and towards alaska, then it seems to me to be connected to
more than ground clutter. There are many other radars around the mountains that
have no problem like this.
The fact is, it is true. Yes, the study I did was two weeks long. However, during that
time I captured 53 anomalies that are consistent with the anomalies he has described (as being
"towards Alaska" which is the northwest, and southward). If one analyzes the angle of the spokes,
they constantly appear at the same angles. This is shown by looking at the
Riverton composite image created from all the
observed Riverton anomalies overlayed on a single image. Likewise, you can look at the
Great Falls composite image created from all the
observed Great Falls anomalies overlayed on a single image.
The fact that other radars near mountains don't have this problem is irrelevant. It's not the
mountains alone that are causing the problem--it's the radar beams from Riverton and Great Falls
bouncing off tall nearby mountains that are causing problems in Billings. Such a configuration
of radars and high mountains and similar radar frequencies simply isn't occuring elsewhere which
is why the same kind of problem isn't observed at other radars near mountains.
[Regarding the angles of Billings spoking] I would like to see these
"spokes" from these radars that you speak of. They surely are not the Spokes that Billings
is doing. Are you saying that the spokes, which seem to be evenly spaced, are hitting mountain
tops? I think your refering to the echo beams that go off at sunrise and sunset.
The images of these anomalies are available here for him, and everyone,
to see. These are clearly not the "sunburst" beams caused by sunrise and sunset. These are the
same anomalies he's speaking of. The angles of the beams are consistent.
Again, when it comes to Beams, not the sunrise/sunset beams, but actual scanning
beams, Nevada is the motherload. Many times you can catch Reno, Las Vegas, Elko NV
and Cedar City UT all beaming at one another. This region is full of Odd activity!
You won't find other radars doing this stuff!
I already explained the Reno anomaly. It is caused by aircraft involved in
combat training at Top Gun at the Fallon airbase east of Reno.
He is wrong, however, in that that Reno, Las Vegas, Elko, and Cedar City are "beaming at one
another." In no case was there ever any beam observed between these cities--they all
came from the restricted airspace where Top Gun does combat training.
[Regarding the fact that anomalies seem to originate from restricted
airspace at Top Gun] This really just makes a point that they are militarized. We could come up with all
kinds of conspiracies of what the Beams are for.
His mindset is completely exposed here. He himself says "we could come up with all kinds of
conspiracies" just based on the fact that the radar anomalies are coming from restricted airspace.
I don't know how others may read this, but I had to chuckle and think, "Yep, you can make up
all kinds of conspiracy theories." But conspiracy theories shouldn't be made up, they should be
built on a logical premise. That he seems ready to "come up with all kinds of conspiracies" to
"fit the data" speaks volumes.
The main question would be, why do
all the radars in that are have a tendency to Beam at one another or cross their
beams?
Again, the radars in Nevada were never observed to "beam at one another" but the spokes
of the beams do cross from time to time. This is completely consistent with the
radars picking up military aircraft and is fully explained here.
I thought dopplar radar was a spinning mechanism that sends out radio waves?
how do we get to beams in one direction?
This comment is truly amazing. It appears as though he thinks that just because a radar is
constantly rotating that is incapable of detecting something in "one direction." If that were
the case, what would be the point of a radar?
The fact is, the Reno radar is rotating. If, as it rotates, it happens to point over the
restricted airspace at Top Gun and one of the dozens of aircraft there just happens to be flying
towards the NEXRAD site the on-aircraft radar will be pointed directly at the NEXRAD dish. This
is effectively like shining a spotlight at someone that is looking at you with binoculars. Just
as they are temporarily blinded, so is the NEXRAD temporarily blinded by the radar energy being
emitted by the aircraft. This is why you see beams.
Also note that I have and animation of the
Reno NV radar, in which you can see a distinct section of the radar move opposite
the spin and then shoot out a large beam. Reno NV is a very very strange radar.
At certain times it looks almost like a large underground satellite dish. it just
sites there and hums with no rotation at all. And it is radiating a very large
section of the ground. I do believe this one to be a weapon!
Again, this one is so full of nonsense it's hard to decide where to start.
First, just because a beam "moves" counter-clockwise doesn't mean the radar is spinning
counter-clockwise. It just means the target it is tracking (in this case aircraft at Fallon)
are moving north.
Second, it's not clear what he means that it looks like a "large
underground satellite dish." Reno's NEXRAD site is pictured to the right and is just a typical
NEXRAD site.
Third, an underground satellite dish would be absurd--the reason satellite dishes
exist is to capture as much energy as possible from a weak signal or focusing a radio signal
to be sent to the satellite. Burying such a device underground would completely defeat the
purpose.
Fourth, it is completely a mystery what he means by "sits there and hums with no
rotation at all." The rotation of NEXRAD is not visible in the images it produces so
there's no way for him to reach such a conclusion.
Fifth, there is no evidence that the Reno
NEXRAD site is "radiating a very large section of the ground." There is absolutely no way to
know (at least from the radar images we have access to) at what angle the radar is pointing. But
aiming it at the ground would be counterproductive and probably result in a radar image much
more abnormal then a few "beams" to the east.
The conclusion that the radar is a weapon is completely unfounded.
[My Comment: The stations at Fairbanks and Anchorage--the two stations closest to HAARP--showed
absolutely no "spoke" activity other than daily sunrise and sunset at times and at angles
consistent with sunrise and sunset. The lack of activity was mutually confirmed. ] Obviously!
Why is this obvious? If the idea is that the energy that these radars are supposed observing or
channeling has something to do with HAARP, why wouldn't we expect to see some kind of anomalies
near HAARP itself?
[Regarding Seattle not showing any anomalies either] As I stated in
my first response. I have backed away from the channeling of HAARP's energy
to the rockies. This does not mean that I do not believe it but it is harder to prove.
If he has "backed away" from the idea of channeling energy from HAARP down through the Rockies
then what does he think is happening? How or why does he think NEXRAD sites are able to control
the weather? Then why is it significant that Billings occasionally spokes towards Alaska
if HAARP isn't a factor? Why is his site called RadarMatrix?
As far as I can tell he's basically saying that the data doesn't support his claims, he can't
prove it, but that he still believes it. This is exactly the problem with his theories. They
aren't based in science, aren't provable, and when data contradicts his beliefs he simply
"backs away" without recognizing the obvious: That his theory is broken!
Seattle often times has what i term, "Electrical Fingers"
coming out of it. They tend to be black with several going one way and several
going another. Question is why and why this radar? I find it very unusual.
I have yet to see these and he doesn't specify at what angle these "black fingers"
appear. However, NEXRAD can and is blocked by high terrain. In Seattle we have the Cascade
mountains to the east and we have the Olympic mountains to the west and southwest. If and
when we see this anomaly at Seattle we can analyze those spokes, but the fact that Seattle
is roughly surrounded by mountains does not make the observation particularly surprising.
My original reason for this connection was because
of my views on Billings. It has always been the most active! You should study the Unisys
High and Low map and correlate how often you see fronts form along the Rockies and
Decide wether or not Billing's Sparks are adding to that in some way. Not to mention
all the radars along the rockies!
Again, he himself uses the word "correlate." A correlation means nothing unless it is a
relation--and he hasn't proven that there is any relation.
[Regarding no anomalies at Riverton WY] I still believe that the
radars along the Rockies, by virtue of their height and their
electrical output, increases the energy along this ridge. If you do believe weather
modification is possible and understand that weather moves from east to west, the
rockies become a logical place to hold energy or build it up.
Weather moves from east to west? Generally it moves west to east. And it's not at
all clear nor does he explain what he means when he says "hold energy or build it up."
[Regarding no anomalies at Denver CO] Without activity meaning
you are not seeing blast or beams I suppose? Denver in particular
often times catched lows and freezes them there. This is something that a conductive
material sprayed or even a combination of height to a low helps a radar attach itself to
a low.
It appears here that he is saying that even though we don't see anything strange happening
at Denver's NEXRAD site, something strange is happening. What he means by "attaching itself
to a low" is anybody's guess. That he thinks a radar site can "catch a low and freeze it
there" is at best a correlation, but I doubt even that. He has yet to demonstrate that any
weather phenomena that he has observed can't be explained by normal meteorological events.
[Regarding no anomalies at Brownsville, San Antonio, and Corpus
Christi TX]The only 3 radars that are worth watching in Texas are Dyess AFB for triggering storms,
Amarillo Tx for holding and steering a low and Galvestone TX.
Again, there is no explanation of how he thinks any of these radars do any of this and, in fact,
there is no reason to believe any of them can do any of this.
In closing: 2 weeks do not make up a study on what radars are
up to..... unless something is up. No? Maybe next time I see something going down you could pump up your system and
capture all this data for me.
His insinuation here is that 2 weeks was not sufficient time to observe the radar anomalies.
However, during the 2 weeks I did observe the anomalies he spoke of at both Billings
and Reno. The anomalies were observed, they were investigated, and they were explained
here and here. He has not mentioned any
other anomalies that we should expect to see at Reno or Billings so it would seem that by
extending the period of observation we will only see more of the same.
That said, it appears he is saying that the next time he sees something interesting happen he
could tell me and I could monitor the sites in question. He also runs a Yahoo Group
dedicated to distributing daily information about radar anomalies. Thus his claims elsewhere
that he believes that radar anomalies are no longer a major factor in his theory seem to be
betrayed by the evidence that he still very actively monitors it.
Also, Unless you watch weathertap, your not going to see a
lot of the anomalies unless you watch all radars at all times. Weathertap is the best
for showing the electricity and static in the air.
WeatherTap simply repackages information available for free from NOAA. There is no
reason to pay money for this information. Even this professional meteorologist
agrees with the fact that there is no reason, in this day and age, to pay for this kind
of weather information.
It will also show you how Billings
and North Platte spark in unison. Have someone explain that because this is a pure fact
that has been happening for the last month or so. How can Billings' spark coinside with
a North platte spark based off of their explination? And why only these 2? This shows
another connection of electricity!
This is explained here. The frequency at which Billings and
North Platte "spark in unison" is consistent with the frequency of two independent random
events happening at the same time. If two people randomly pick a number between 1 and 10,
they will pick the same number, on average, once every 10 times. That doesn't mean there's
any connection between the two people--simple probablity demands that this will happen from
time to time. The frequency at which an anomaly occurs at Billings and North Platte is
well within the expected statistcal frequency of such an event.
Further, that they "spark in unison" is itself a suspect statement since each NEXRAD station
produces an updated image every 5 to 11 minutes. The national composite image that he is looking
at is made up of the last available image from each NEXRAD station. The fact that in any
given national radar images it appears that Billings and North Platte "spark" at the same time
does not mean the anomalies actually occured at the same time--it just means that the latest
images from both sites had anomalies and that means the anomalies at either station simply
occured within the last 5 to 11 minutes. The Billings imagery might be from 11:38AM while the
North Platte imagery might be from 11:41AM.
The very concept that these sites present anomalies in "unison" is, thus, further weakened.
You cannot believe what a radar tech tells you or someone who is
only programmed to read a screen. They are told what to say.
Here he is telling us that we shouldn't trust a professional that is trained in radar operations
and should, instead, trust him who seems to have absolutely no radar experience whatsoever aside
from watching them on the Internet for a couple of years and coming up with unfounded theories.
Ask a radar tech how fried he would get sitting close to one of
these radars. We are talking about electricity being thrown out into the
air here. Lets discuss the electricity factor! I am suggesting that with 140 radars
spinning out energy, GWEN towers and cell towers, coupled with chemtrails creates an
enviroment of electricity in the sky. That there is a connection in this grid. Only a
cerain few are players in controlling weather. When there is fog or cold dense air,
radar become involved. Not all, but some. My previous post spells out the simplicity
of control.
His previous post said weather control was simple, but never explained it.
In terms of the energy being "thrown out" by NEXRAD, it is trivial compared to all the
radio waves being emitted by other radio stations and cell phones around the world. If, in the
above paragraph, he's suggesting that there is a lot of radio waves in use, yes, we agree. But
that doesn't mean that NEXRAD is dangerous or capable of weather control or SDI and he hasn't
demonstrated that to be the case.
Your next study should be to get on CTTUSA chemtrail group and when
someone post heavy spraying, you call their local news or local air traffic controller and ask them
what those planes are that are spraying all those lines. You just may get lucky and
find someone who will spill a thing or 2 about military exercises.
Here we witness another conspiracy theory strategy: When you have run out of things in
support of your theory, switch modes. Here he switches away from the radar anomalies and runs
to the chemtrail conspiracy. These conspiracy theories are all built on a logical house of
cards. They are all intertwined such that when one theory is called into question, they point
to yet other theories which they suggest prop up the broken theory even in the face of evidence
to the contrary.
I would also like to see you get these people at Nexrad to explain each type of radar
blast. Why some have cutout portions, why some look like electrical spokes, why the
New Orleans and Long island one produce a "spiral graph" return. This should be
interesting.
We are currently working on compiling that information.
I know that reality dictates that weather
modification and Star Wars are real by virtue of the documents found on military sites
and the publications. So the next question is how? Most of what I studied came from
a specific time when certain things were going down. My views on things have changed
from different theories thru the 3 years. Do me a favor and don't just study for 2
weeks.
This is another common aspect of conspiracy theories: their ability to evolve. Here he is
basically saying that his theory has been changed and molded over time. While the argument
could be made that his theories are changing because of a growing understanding of the problem,
the reality is his theories are changing because they aren't supported by ongoing observations.
Try a year of studying your sky outside, locate your main radar and look in
its direction. This is of course you see what looks to be chemtrails on a regular
bases in your area. When big events happen like a Prominent Senator dying in a plane
wreck, go check the satellite and radars. Especially pay close attention to
everything come election time. Low Voter turnout is going to be needed for Bush on
that night so watch and see how much rain/snow or even cold hits the US and see
if you can correlate it to odd radar activity.
Again he is bringing up the chemtrail conspiracy to try to prop up his theory which, on its
own, has failed completely.
Owning weather by the oil/energy
trade is a cash cow. Just by making it cold a few days early in the fall will
cause people to switch their thermostats from cool to heat. Even if it is on
automatic you are now switched over to continue the milking of money. See the
California Crisis for an example of this behavior.
Now he is saying that weather control is in the hands of not the government, but the oil/energy
companies (although people like him tend to think of them as one and the same).
To put the ease on those who are reading this, I am not
going to do a huge cut and paste job to score points on every sentence. You may be on
the up and up but I have to tell you this is usually the tactic of a disinformant.
Here he is suggesting that just because I take him to task point-by-point on each aspect
of his previous message that I am some kind of "disinformant." What it really comes down
to is the fact that most conspiracy theorists are bothered when their theory is subject
to critical, point-by-point analysis. Their theories aren't built for that kind of
analysis but rather are built for those that read a theory, digest it, and accept it as
a whole rather than thinking critically about any specific part of it.
I will also admit that your line of question was
not very impressive. You skirt some basic questions and an ability to catch my drift.
You may very well be too technical for your own good. Vice verse could be said for me.
I may be "too technical for my own good?" He is making some far-reaching allegations based
on some dubious theories. What his theory needs is a technical, scientific analysis.
To suggest that I am "too technical" is almost an admission that the theory isn't up to snuff
as a valid, scientific theory.
I am a bit thrown that you do not even know of things that are on my site and that you
never bothered to contact we. Instead I hear about this from someone in here who did
the simple thing of hitting the CONTACT button on my site. Kudos indeed!
He has taken my analysis and study of the radar anomalies personally. I never intended (originally)
to enter a debate with him, but rather to debate it with others in the forum. The fact that I may
or may not know of things that are on his site are primarily due to two reasons: 1) His site is
very poorly organized and is a mish-mash of conspiracy links. There is no overall logical flow
that I could ascertain that would give me an idea of what I need to read to understand his
theories. 2) My original study was not on every aspect of his conspiracy theory but rather
just the radar anomalies. I saw and see no reason to explore his theories further until he can
at least explain why the radar anomalies are something other than radar anomalies.
A 2 week study for anomalies was a waste of time and hopefully not of someone's money.
I layed out the specifics of radar control that is not found on my site. You cannot
challenge those without a decent amount of daily watching and observing.
As I mentioned above, the 2-week study was enough to witness the anomalies he talked about
regarding Billings and Reno. There is no evidence nor suggestion that watching either of these
sites for more time is going to lead to the observation of any new anomalies and the anomalies that
were already observed have been satisfactorily explained.
Radar anomalies at this juncture of the game are far and few.
Billings, North Platte, Nevada and a few scattered blast are all that is caught.
Agreed. Quality control in the NEXRAD network has improved over time.
Your observation of calibrations holds no water. I heard that line
early in the game and accepted it on face value by my own observation proved otherwise. I know
for a fact that these blast have affected the air as well!
He claims to know it for a fact yet has not explained how he knows it or how it supposedly
works.
My common sense tells me that more than 10% need to be callibrated so under
your view I should, in 3 years, seen those other radars be callibrated.
No, because generally when a radar is calibrated it is taken offline so that a
No Radar status is returned. If he's been watching the
national radar composite or if he's watching non-NOAA services (such as WeatherTap), it is
entirely possible he will not see these messages. The point isn't that radars are no longer
being calibrated but rather that when they are calibrated they are now more frequently
taken offline correctly. Thus "blasts" are now far less common.
- From this message (Fri Feb 13, 2004 8:16 pm)
The earths axis is steering more towards longer days and warmer weather. Why now are we getting
some of the coldest air now? Is the electricity, that we produce from radar, drawing more cold
down? Why did the southern radars jump up in electricity? As far as I can tell this cold is
just now coming down.
The date of this comment was February 13th, 2004. The average temperature for
